Peterson & Fitch v. State

32 Tex. 477
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1870·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

The appellants were indicted at the Spring-term of the District Court of Grimes county for the year 1868. They were charged with selling intoxicating liquors, in quantities less than a quart, to one E. H. Giezel, without having first obtained license to sell. The defendants pleafi guilty to-the facts, but set up an answer in avoidance of the penalty. The court ruled the answer insufficient to bar the action, and the jury fixed the fine at $100.

We will say here that the indictment was void. The defendants should have been indicted as individuals, and not as a partnership firm. But they took their appeal to this court; their appeal was taken upon an imperfect record, which their counsel insisted was sufficient. This court, on inspection of the record, dismissed the appeal, and they have attempted again to appeal. This can not be done.

The appeal is therefore dismissed and the cause remanded.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson & Fitch v. State, 32 Tex. 477 (Tex. 1870).

32 Tex. 477 (Peterson & Fitch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1969
People v. Barquet
19 P.R. 753 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1913)
Pueblo v. Barquet
19 P.R. Dec. 792 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1913)
Grant v. State
8 Tex. Ct. App. 432 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1880)