Peterkin v. Quick Chill Food Services

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 3, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-07819·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KAHENE PETERKIN, Plaintiff, 19-CV-7819 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL QUICK CHILL FOOD SERVICES, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On November 27, 2019, the Court received the attached letter from Plaintiff advising the Court that he wishes to withdraw his complaint. ECF 1:19-CV-7819, 9. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff's request to withdraw this action pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The complaint is voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 3, 2019 , New York, New York hie. I Hk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterkin v. Quick Chill Food Services, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Peterkin v. Quick Chill Food Services (Peterkin v. Quick Chill Food Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)