Peter Actie v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Cersandra D. Teague, and Keith Clendennen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 2006
Docket14-05-00927-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Peter Actie v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Cersandra D. Teague, and Keith Clendennen (Peter Actie v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Cersandra D. Teague, and Keith Clendennen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peter Actie v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Cersandra D. Teague, and Keith Clendennen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00927-CV

PETER ACTIE, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CERSANDRA D. TEAGUE, AND KEITH CLENDENNEN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31344

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Peter Actie, an inmate, filed suit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Daniel C. Agbaroji, Cersandra D. Teague, and Keith Clendennen.  TDCJ, Teague and Clendennen moved to dismiss Actie=s claims pursuant to Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.  The trial court granted the motion.


The record before this court does not reflect Actie=s suit against Agbaroji has been dismissed and no order of severance appears in the record.  The order Actie is appealing from is not a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order.  See Street v. Honorable Second Court of Appeals, 756 S.W.2d 299, 301 (Tex. 1988) (A judgment is final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all issues and parties in a case), and Southwest Investments Diversified, Inc. v. Estate of Mieszkuc, 171 S.W.3d 461,467 (Tex.App.‑Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (Absent a statutory or constitutional source of authority, our appellate jurisdiction is limited to final judgments).  In the absence of an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction of this appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southwest Investments Diversified, Inc. v. Estate of Mieszkuc
171 S.W.3d 461 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Street v. Honorable Second Court of Appeals
756 S.W.2d 299 (Texas Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Peter Actie v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Cersandra D. Teague, and Keith Clendennen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peter-actie-v-texas-department-of-criminal-justice-texapp-2006.