Pesce v. Pesce

223 A.D.2d 647, 637 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 419
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 647 (Pesce v. Pesce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pesce v. Pesce, 223 A.D.2d 647, 637 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 for a permanent order of protection, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered July 19, 1994, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition. The petitioner’s notice of appeal from the decision is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Westchester County, for a dispositional hearing and entry of an appropriate order of disposition; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of this Court dated July 18, 1994, which continued the terms of the temporary order of protection dated March 24, 1994, pending hearing and determination of the appeal, shall remain in effect pending entry of an order of disposition.

Contrary to the Family Court’s determination, the petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent committed acts constituting, inter alia, harassment and disorderly conduct, warranting the issuance of an order of protection against him (see, Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Penal Law § 240.26 [3]; § 240.20 [7]; Matter of Holcomb v Holcomb, 176 AD2d 409; Matter of Rogers v Rogers, 161 AD2d 766; Merola v Merola, 146 AD2d 611). Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Family Court for a dispositional hearing (see, Family Ct Act § 833). Rosenblatt, J. P., Hart, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. Wallace
45 A.D.3d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Dancer v. Robertson
38 A.D.3d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Bonsignore v. Bonsignore
37 A.D.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Bhanote v. Bhanote
22 A.D.3d 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Wissink v. Wissink
13 A.D.3d 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Clarke v. Clarke
8 A.D.3d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Dienes v. Dienes
240 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 A.D.2d 647, 637 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pesce-v-pesce-nyappdiv-1996.