Dienes v. Dienes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dienes v. Dienes

240 A.D.2d 576, 659 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6594

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of protection of the Family Court, Richmond County (Clark J.), dated July 7, 1995, which, after a hearing, directed the appellant, inter alia, not to assault, menace, harass, recklessly endanger, or engage in disorderly conduct toward the petitioner and to stay away from her and her residence for a period of one year.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court’s conclusion that the appellant committed the family offense of harassment, thereby warranting the issuance of an order of protection against him (see, Matter of Platsky v Platsky, 237 AD2d 610; Matter of Cesaire v Cesaire, 228 AD2d 592; Matter of Tibichrani v Debs, 230 AD2d 746; Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone, 225 AD2d 767; Matter of Pesce v Pesce, 223 AD2d 647). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of protection of the Family Court, Richmond County (Clark J.), dated July 7, 1995, which, after a hearing, directed the appellant, inter alia, not to assault, menace, harass, recklessly endanger, or engage in disorderly conduct toward the petitioner and to stay away from her and her residence for a period of one year.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court’s conclusion that the appellant committed the family offense of harassment, thereby warranting the issuance of an order of protection against him (see, Matter of Platsky v Platsky, 237 AD2d 610; Matter of Cesaire v Cesaire, 228 AD2d 592; Matter of Tibichrani v Debs, 230 AD2d 746; Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone, 225 AD2d 767; Matter of Pesce v Pesce, 223 AD2d 647). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Dienes v. Dienes, 240 A.D.2d 576, 659 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

240 A.D.2d 576 (Dienes v. Dienes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related