Perry v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 240, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 769
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 Cust. Ct. 172
United States Customs Court·Decided November 17, 1948·No. No. 52684; protests 792809-G and 922749-G (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

[241]*241Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of so-called “artificial gut or artificial teguso,” in chief value of silk, the same in all material respects as the merchandise the classification of which was involved in Bush v. United States (34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 240, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 769 (cusc 1948).

21 Cust. Ct. 240 (Perry v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.