Perry v. State
955 So. 2d 1214, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7108, 2007 WL 1342538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 892 So. 2d 1062 →
Opinion
Appellant’s postconviction relief claim that prior to entering Ms plea, his counsel misadvised him as to the length of a potential sentence, is conclusively refuted by the thorough and detailed plea conference conducted by the trial court. See Scheele v. State, 953 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), reh’g granted No. 4D06-38 (Fla. 4th DCA May 9, 2007) (observing that “[w]hat is said and done at a plea conference carries consequences”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. State, 955 So. 2d 1214, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7108, 2007 WL 1342538 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
955 So. 2d 1214 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scheele v. State
953 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)