Perry v. State
940 So. 2d 1144, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13647, 2006 WL 2356156
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2006·No. No. 2D06-741·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Deandre Perry challenges the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of his first claim pursuant to Meriweather v. State, 740 So.2d 1210, 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of his second claim because the sentencing scoresheet correctly included points for his convictions of two counts of possession of burglary tools.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. State, 940 So. 2d 1144, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13647, 2006 WL 2356156 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
940 So. 2d 1144 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citizens for Resp. Growth v. St. Pete Beach
940 So. 2d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)