Perry v. State

182 So. 408, 28 Ala. App. 259, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 168
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 21, 1938
Docket7 Div. 350.
StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 408 (Perry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. State, 182 So. 408, 28 Ala. App. 259, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 168 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

We - have endeavored to perform our duty under the provisions of Code 1923, Sec. 3258, but we find nothing to require a reversal of the judgment of conviction.

Appellant, however, was on trial for, and convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder (Code 1923; Sec. 3303) ; and his punishment should have been fixed by the court in accordance with the terms of Code 1923, Secs. 5278, 5267, 5268 and 3303.

So much of the jury’s verdict as undertook to fix the punishment to be imposed may be disregarded as surplusage. Freeman v. State, 151 Ala. 10, 44 So. 46.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed; and the cause remanded to the lower court for sentence in accordance with the above.

Affirmed. Remanded for proper sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeman v. State
44 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 408, 28 Ala. App. 259, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-state-alactapp-1938.