Perry v. Hardy
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KAHREEMPERRY, SSS
Plaintiff, -against- 25 CIVIL 3314 (KMW) JUDGMENT GLENN F. HARDY; NORMAN WILLIAMS, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 14, 2025, Plaintiff's complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i1). The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims Plaintiff may be asserting. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is entered dismissing this case. Dated: New York, New York July 15, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: K, MANGO DeputyClerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. Hardy (Perry v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.