Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick"
Opinion
lOlltS Texas Court of Criminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308 Austin, Texas 78711
"In re Eric Flores , pro se relator"
"In re The State of Texas , relator"
Vs.
Richard James "Rick" Perry , defendant
Trial Court Case No. D-l-DC-14-100139 Third Court of Appeals Case No.3-15-00063-CR Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Case No.PD-1067-15
PETITION FOR AMICUS CARIAE BRIEF IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
(l)Table of Contents COURT OF CRIMINAL APPHALS (2)Parties of Interest (3)Opinions Below ^ 27 2015 (4)Question Presented (5)Constitutional Statutes (^^c^_ c.,>, (6)Jurisdictional Statement (7)Statement of the Case (8)Statement of Facts (9)Summary of Argument (lO)Argument (ll)Conclussion and Prayer
Pleaded By : "In re Eric Flores , pro se relator" General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr., El Paso Texas 79910 (2)Parties of Interest
(i)Eric Flores is a party of interest whoms place of business is
designated at General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr., El Paso Texas
79910.
(ii)Richard James "Rick" Perry is a party of interest whoms place
of business is designated at 122 C St., NW, Ste. 200Washington,
DC 20001.
(iii)The State of Texas is a party of interest whoms place of
business is designated at State Capitol, P.O. Box 12697 Room
1E.8 Austin Texas 78701
(3) Opinion Belows
(i) Pursuant to Texas Rules of Evidence no.402 evidence relevant
to the subject matter of the case is generally admissible.
The pro se relator has filed a motion to joinder of certain offenses
that were committed by the defendant in the commission of the
pending criminal offenses in the lower district court.
Texas Rule of Evidence no.402 gives the pro se relator
jurisdictional basis to file the motion for joinder of certain offenses that were committed by the defendant in the commission of the
(4) Questions Presented
(i) Whether the Texas Rules of Evidence no. 402 allows , enables ,
or procurrs for the pro se relator to file a motion to joinder of
certain offenses that the defendant committed in the commission
of the pending criminal offenses in the lower district court.
(ii) Whether the defendant is a threat to the public interest of
health and safety.
(iii) Whether the pro se relator , his relatives , the prosecuteing
attorney , and district judge will suffer irreparable injury such as
death if the appellate court does not grant the relief that is being
seeked herein.
(iv) Whether the irreparable injury such as death that the pro se
relator , his relatives , the prosecuteing attorney , the district
judges , and other members of the public will suffer far outweighs
the legal injury if any that the defendant will suffer if the
appellate court grants the relief settforth herein. (v) Whether the relief that is being seeked herein is in the public
interest of health and safety.
(5) Jurisdictional Statement
Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no. 11 the pro se
relators establishes good cause to file this foregoing "Aminus
Cariae" brief because it is of imperative importance to the public
interest of health and safety since the Aminus Cariae brief is
seeking relief from imminent danger such as death on behalf of
the public.
This means that a large number of the population will die if the
appellate court does not give consideration to the merit of this
brief.
The defendant has previously shown to be violent and hostile
when other officials are providing witness testimony to seek
criminal prosecution against the defendant, by randomly causeing
the death of members of the public until the defendants anger
subsides.
This means that it is necessary for the appellate court to consider
the merits of this brief. The pro se relator hereby gives judicial notice that this case arises
from the commission of a crime that was committed by the
defendant against the pro se relator whom then seeked for the
Travis County District Attorneys Office Public Integerty Unit to
investigate and prosecute the defendant for committing a crime
against the pro se relator and his immediate relatives.
The defendant then malingered and construed circumstance to
where the defendant could use his public office to remove the
functions of the Travis County District Attorney Public Integerty
Unit to prevent the pro se relator from launching an investigation
that could have resulted in criminal lawful sanctions against the
defendant.
After the Travis County District Attorney Public Integerty Unit
indicted Richard James "Rick" Perry for coercion of public official
to obstruct justice and abuse of power , the defendant then
threatened to cause the death of the pro se relator , his relatives ,
the prosecuteing attorney , and the district judge. The defendant has previously carried out a death threat by
causeing the death of more than three of the pro se relators
relatives constituteing mass murder in the first degree.
For this reason the defendant has the substantial likelihood of
carrying out his recent death threat to cause the death of the pro
se relator , his relatives , prosecuteing attorney , and the district
judge assigned to the case if the appellate court does not intervene
to enforce the performance of a duty as clearly defined by law.
The irreparable injury such as death that the pro se relator , his
relatives , the prosecuteing attorney , and the district judge will
suffer far outweighgs the legal injury if any that the defendant
will endure if the appellate court does grant the relief that is being
seeked.
Although the pro se relator Eric Flores has entitled his petition
Amicus Cariae Brief however pro se relator Eric Flores petition
sounds in mandamus relief.
For this reason the pro se relator Eric Flores cites the legal basis
that invokes the appellate courts jurisdiction to enforce the performance of a duty as clearly defined by law as settforth below
, in particular;
The Texas Constitution grants the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals such original jurisdiction as may be provided by law to
enforce the performance of a duty as clearly defined by law in the
lower court of appeals and the district courts.
[Tex.Const.Art.5 ,&6].The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has
the power to issue a writ of mandamus to enforce its jurisdiction
over the lower court of appeals and the lower district court to
ensure the effective and expeditious administration of the
business of the lower court of appeals and the district
court[Tex. Gov. Code & 22.221 (a). In addition , the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals has general mandamus authority against
district and county court judges that have been elected within the
jurisdictional bounderies of the State of Texas. Against these
judges , the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has the authority to
issue all writs of mandamus that are agreeable to the principles of
law that regulate the lower court of appeals and the lower district
court[Tex.Gov.Code. &22.221(b)].This provision has been interpreted to expand the mandamus power of the Texas Court of
Appeals so that it is virtuely identical to that of the lower court of
appeals[see Dickens v. Ct. of App., 2nd Sup.Jud.Dist., 727 S.W.2d
542 , 548 (Tex.Crim.App.1987].
Pursuant to all subsections of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedures
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
lOlltS Texas Court of Criminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308 Austin, Texas 78711
"In re Eric Flores , pro se relator"
"In re The State of Texas , relator"
Vs.
Richard James "Rick" Perry , defendant
Trial Court Case No. D-l-DC-14-100139 Third Court of Appeals Case No.3-15-00063-CR Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Case No.PD-1067-15
PETITION FOR AMICUS CARIAE BRIEF IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
(l)Table of Contents COURT OF CRIMINAL APPHALS (2)Parties of Interest (3)Opinions Below ^ 27 2015 (4)Question Presented (5)Constitutional Statutes (^^c^_ c.,>, (6)Jurisdictional Statement (7)Statement of the Case (8)Statement of Facts (9)Summary of Argument (lO)Argument (ll)Conclussion and Prayer
Pleaded By : "In re Eric Flores , pro se relator" General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr., El Paso Texas 79910 (2)Parties of Interest
(i)Eric Flores is a party of interest whoms place of business is
designated at General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr., El Paso Texas
79910.
(ii)Richard James "Rick" Perry is a party of interest whoms place
of business is designated at 122 C St., NW, Ste. 200Washington,
DC 20001.
(iii)The State of Texas is a party of interest whoms place of
business is designated at State Capitol, P.O. Box 12697 Room
1E.8 Austin Texas 78701
(3) Opinion Belows
(i) Pursuant to Texas Rules of Evidence no.402 evidence relevant
to the subject matter of the case is generally admissible.
The pro se relator has filed a motion to joinder of certain offenses
that were committed by the defendant in the commission of the
pending criminal offenses in the lower district court.
Texas Rule of Evidence no.402 gives the pro se relator
jurisdictional basis to file the motion for joinder of certain offenses that were committed by the defendant in the commission of the
(4) Questions Presented
(i) Whether the Texas Rules of Evidence no. 402 allows , enables ,
or procurrs for the pro se relator to file a motion to joinder of
certain offenses that the defendant committed in the commission
of the pending criminal offenses in the lower district court.
(ii) Whether the defendant is a threat to the public interest of
health and safety.
(iii) Whether the pro se relator , his relatives , the prosecuteing
attorney , and district judge will suffer irreparable injury such as
death if the appellate court does not grant the relief that is being
seeked herein.
(iv) Whether the irreparable injury such as death that the pro se
relator , his relatives , the prosecuteing attorney , the district
judges , and other members of the public will suffer far outweighs
the legal injury if any that the defendant will suffer if the
appellate court grants the relief settforth herein. (v) Whether the relief that is being seeked herein is in the public
interest of health and safety.
(5) Jurisdictional Statement
Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no. 11 the pro se
relators establishes good cause to file this foregoing "Aminus
Cariae" brief because it is of imperative importance to the public
interest of health and safety since the Aminus Cariae brief is
seeking relief from imminent danger such as death on behalf of
the public.
This means that a large number of the population will die if the
appellate court does not give consideration to the merit of this
brief.
The defendant has previously shown to be violent and hostile
when other officials are providing witness testimony to seek
criminal prosecution against the defendant, by randomly causeing
the death of members of the public until the defendants anger
subsides.
This means that it is necessary for the appellate court to consider
the merits of this brief. The pro se relator hereby gives judicial notice that this case arises
from the commission of a crime that was committed by the
defendant against the pro se relator whom then seeked for the
Travis County District Attorneys Office Public Integerty Unit to
investigate and prosecute the defendant for committing a crime
against the pro se relator and his immediate relatives.
The defendant then malingered and construed circumstance to
where the defendant could use his public office to remove the
functions of the Travis County District Attorney Public Integerty
Unit to prevent the pro se relator from launching an investigation
that could have resulted in criminal lawful sanctions against the
defendant.
After the Travis County District Attorney Public Integerty Unit
indicted Richard James "Rick" Perry for coercion of public official
to obstruct justice and abuse of power , the defendant then
threatened to cause the death of the pro se relator , his relatives ,
the prosecuteing attorney , and the district judge. The defendant has previously carried out a death threat by
causeing the death of more than three of the pro se relators
relatives constituteing mass murder in the first degree.
For this reason the defendant has the substantial likelihood of
carrying out his recent death threat to cause the death of the pro
se relator , his relatives , prosecuteing attorney , and the district
judge assigned to the case if the appellate court does not intervene
to enforce the performance of a duty as clearly defined by law.
The irreparable injury such as death that the pro se relator , his
relatives , the prosecuteing attorney , and the district judge will
suffer far outweighgs the legal injury if any that the defendant
will endure if the appellate court does grant the relief that is being
seeked.
Although the pro se relator Eric Flores has entitled his petition
Amicus Cariae Brief however pro se relator Eric Flores petition
sounds in mandamus relief.
For this reason the pro se relator Eric Flores cites the legal basis
that invokes the appellate courts jurisdiction to enforce the performance of a duty as clearly defined by law as settforth below
, in particular;
The Texas Constitution grants the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals such original jurisdiction as may be provided by law to
enforce the performance of a duty as clearly defined by law in the
lower court of appeals and the district courts.
[Tex.Const.Art.5 ,&6].The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has
the power to issue a writ of mandamus to enforce its jurisdiction
over the lower court of appeals and the lower district court to
ensure the effective and expeditious administration of the
business of the lower court of appeals and the district
court[Tex. Gov. Code & 22.221 (a). In addition , the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals has general mandamus authority against
district and county court judges that have been elected within the
jurisdictional bounderies of the State of Texas. Against these
judges , the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has the authority to
issue all writs of mandamus that are agreeable to the principles of
law that regulate the lower court of appeals and the lower district
court[Tex.Gov.Code. &22.221(b)].This provision has been interpreted to expand the mandamus power of the Texas Court of
Appeals so that it is virtuely identical to that of the lower court of
appeals[see Dickens v. Ct. of App., 2nd Sup.Jud.Dist., 727 S.W.2d
542 , 548 (Tex.Crim.App.1987].
Pursuant to all subsections of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedures
no.52 (for original proceedings) the relator submits this foregoing
"Petition for Aminus Caraie Brief Sounding in Mandamus Relief
to invoke the jurisdiction the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
because it is necessary to " correct a clear abuse of discretion or
the violation of a duty imposed by law when the lower court of
appeals and the district court has given the relator no other
adequate remedy at law"[CSR Ltd. V. Link, 925 S.W.2d 591 , 596
(Tex.l996)( quoting Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals , 700
S.W.2d 916 , 917 (Tex.1985); see also Republican Party of Texas v.
Dietz , 940 S.W.2d 86, 88 (Tex. 1997).
(6) Constitutional Statutes
Dickens v. Ct. of App., 2nd Sup.Jud.Dist., 727 S.W.2d 542 , 548 (Tex.Crim.App.1987].
"CSR Ltd. V. Link, 925 S.W.2d 591 , 596 (Tex.l996)( quoting
Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals , 700 S.W.2d 916 , 917 (Tex.1985); see also Republican Party of Texas v. Dietz , 940
S.W.2d86, 88 (Tex. 1997).
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no. 11
Texas Constitution Article 5 & 6
Texas Government Code & 22.221(a)
Texas Government Code & 22.221(b)
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no. 52
Texas Rules of Evdience no. 406
Texas Rule of Evidence no.405
Texas Rules of Evidence no.404
Texas Rule of Evdience no.608
Texas Rule of Evidence no.609
(7)Statement of the Case
The circumstances of this case begin when the pro se relator first
wittnessed a corrupt police officer named Paul McDowell
employed by the El Paso Police Department Pebble Hills Regional
Command Center in El Paso Texas to include the corrupt police
officers immediate relative whom were purchaseing cocaine at the
place of the petitioners mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores place of
residence. The defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry then misused his
official capacity to influence , instruct, direct, coerce , or
otherwise bribe and solicitate the corrupt police officers named
Paul McDowell and his police coworkers to begin to use deadly
technology to cause the petitioner and his immediate relatives
severe mental or physical pain for long durations exceeding
calendar days in which was equivalent in intensity to organ
failure or impairment of body functions resulting in the death of
more than four of the pro se relator immediate relatives
constitutieng mass murder in the first degree in which was solely
conspired to intimidate the petitioner and his immediate relatives
such as his mother to not reveal any information regarding the
police officers purchaseing cocaine at the place of the petitioners'
mothers' residency..
The petitioner then went to the El Paso Police Department
Internal Affairs Division to complain that a corrupt police officer
named Paul McDowell and his immediate relative were
purchaseing cocaine from the petitioners mother at the place of
her residence. The petitioner further complained to the El Paso Police
Department Internal Affairs Divisions, that the corrupt police
officer named Paul McDowell and his corrupt police supervisor by
the last name of Seargent Larra from the El Paso Police
Department Pebble Hills Regional Command Center were using
deadly technology to cause the petitioner and his immediate
relatives severe mental or physical pain for long durations
exceeding calendar days in which was equivalent in intensity to
organ failure or impairmnent of body functions resulting in the
death of more than four of the petitioners relatives.
The defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry then further misused
his official capacity to instruct, influence , direct, coerce , or
otherwise bribe and solicitate the corrupt police officer named
Paul McDowell and his supervisor by the last name of Seargent
Lara employed by the El Paso Police Department Pebble Hills
Regional Command Center to use advanced technology with a
direct signal to the satelite in outerspace that has the capability of
calculateing a genetic code to virtually communicate statements of
intimidation such as the phrase "I'll Have You" so as to give the indication that the corrupt police supervisor last name Larra"
would cause the death of the pro se relator and his immediate
relative as a retaliatory adversed act against the pro se relator for
complianing against the corrupt police officer named Paul
McDowell to the El Paso Police Department Internal Affairs
Division.
Thereafter the petitioner then went to the El Paso Police
Department Internal Affairs Division a second time to complain
that corrupt police officer named Seargent Larra was threatening
to cause the death of the pro se relator or his immediate relatives
as a retaliatory adversed act against the pro se relator for
complaining to the El Paso Police Department Internal Affairs
Divisions.
Four months later the defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry
further misused his official capacity to influence , instruct, direct
,coerce , or otherwise bribe and solicitate the corrupt police officer
named Paul McDowell to carry out the death threat by shooting
and killing the pro se relators' brother Javier Flores Junior and
then implanting evidence into the shooting crime scene such as a knife so as to be able to falsely alleged that the scratch wounds
that the corrupt police officer named Paul McDowell had on his
face that were inflicted by his female immediate relative in
another incident that had occurred prior to the shooting incident
in anticipation to be able to allege that the scratch marks were the
knife wounds that the pro se relators brother Javier Flores Junior
inflicted on the corrupt police officers face with the knife that the
police officer implanted into the shooting crime scene so as to
falsely justify the corrupt police officers actions of using a weapon
such as a gun to shoot and kill the pro se relators' brother Javier
Flores Junior in which was solely conspired to cover up any
premeditative motive that the pro se relator had established by
reporting the police officers death threats to the El Paso Police
Department Internal Affairs Divisions four months before the
corrupt police officer named Paul McDowell had actually carried
out the death threat by shooting and killing the pro se relators
brother Javier Flores Junior.
The defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry further misused his
official capacity to impanel specific members of a state grand jury with the view of secureing a not guilty verdict against the police
officer named Paul McDowell for shooting and killing the pro se
relators brother Javier Flores Junior by intentionally and
knowingly withholding evidence from the grand jury knowledge
such as pro se relators compliant to the El Paso Police
Department Internal Affairs Divisions against police officer Paul
McDowell and supervisor last name (Larra) death threat which
was made four months before police officers carried out death
threat by shooting and killing the pro se relators brother Javier
Flores Junior.
The corrupt police officer named Paul McDowell and his corrupt
coworkers Seargent Larra further conspired to illegally
incarcerate the pro se relator before shooting and killing the
petitioners brother Javier Flores Junior so that the pro se relator
could not be able to tell the investigative detectives at the time of
that the shooting incident occurred , that the pro se relator had
complained to the El Paso Police Department Internal Affairs
Division that the corrupt police officer named Paul McDowell and
his corrupt supervisor named Larra had threatened to kill the pro se relator or his immediate relatives which was reported to the El
Paso Police Department Internal Affairs Divisions four months
before the corrupt police officer named Paul McDowell actually
carried out the death threat by shooting and killing the pro se
relators brother Javier Flores Junior so as to coincide with the
corrupt police officers Paul McDowell conspiracy to cover up
premeditated capital murder in the first degree.
official capacity to influence , instruct, direct, coerce , or
otherwise bribe and solicitate the corrupt police officers named
Paul McDowell and his corrupt supervisor named Larra to further
conspired to send their immediate relatives to take turns sexually
assualting the pro se relators mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores and
hold her hostage at the place of her residence so as to prevent her
from communicateing to state or federal law enforcement agencies
to complain that she was being sexually assualted by the same
police officers that conspired to kill her son Javier Flores Junior.
The corrupt police officer named Paul McDowell and his corrupt
supervisor named Larra first sent a person of mexican american national origin by the first name of Eddie Shawl that was directly
related to another corrupt law enforcement police officer, whom
repeatedly sexually assaulted the petitioners mother Cynthia
Lorenza Flores and held her hostage at the place of her residence
so as to prevent her from complaining to state or federal law
enforcement agency that she was being sexually assaulted by the
same police officers that conspired to kill her eldest son Javier
After the pro se relator was released from illegally incarceration
the pro se relator called the 911 emergency hotline system to
complian that several police officers were sending different
persons portraying to have the same named Eddie Shawl to
repeatedly take turns sexually assualting the mother (Cynthia
Lorenza Flores) of the person (Javier Flores Junior) that the
corrupt police officers conspired too murder.
The police department declined to prosecute the sexual assualt
incident because police officers were involved in sending
immediate relatives to sexually assualt the mother (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) of the person (Javier Flores Junior) that the
official capacity to influence , direct, coerce , intimidate , or
otherwise bribe and solicitate the corrupt police officers named
Paul McDowell and his corrupt supervisor named Larra to
retaliate against the pro se relator for calling 911 emergency
hotline to complain against the police officers that were sexually
assaulting the pro se relator mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores by
using advanced technology with a direct signal to the satelite in
outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a genetic code to
cause the petitioners mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores severe gul
blatter pain for long durations exceeding calendar days in which
was equivalent in intensity to impair her gul blatter functions
almost leading to her death requireing medical treatment from a
forensic medical professional in a freeworld hospital to keep her
from dieing in which was solely conspired to intimidate the pro se
relators mother to not only be prohibited from going to state or
federal law enforcement agencies to report that she was being sexually assualted by the immediate relatives of the same corrupt
police officers that first conspired to kill her eldest son Javier
Flores Junior , but also the corrupt police officers actions of using
deadly technology to torture the pro se relators mother was to
intimdate the pro se relators mother to go to the police
department to state that she was not being sexually assualted so
as to be able to charge the pro se relators with the criminal offense
of false reporting to illegally incarcerate the pro se relator for the
purpose of preventing the pro se relator from continue to
communicateing to state or federal law enforcement agencies with
the specific intent of preventing a judicial investigation that can
result in criminal lawful sanctions against the defendant, his co
conspiratoring corrupt police officers and their immediate
relatives for takeing turns repeatedly sexually assualting the
mother (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) of the person (Javier Flores
Junior) that the corrupt police officers conspired to murder.
The pro se relators mother had just gotten out of the hospital as a
result of being tortured almost leading to her death and feared for
her life to the extent that she felt so intimidated that she complied with the defendant and his co conspiratoring corrupt police
officers demands to go to the police department to state that she
was not being sexually assualted so as to prevent a criminal
investigation that can result in criminal lawful sanctions against
the defendant and his co conspiratoring corrupt police officers and
their immediate relatives for takeing turns repeatedly sexaully
assaulting the petitioners mother (Cynthia Lorenza Flores).
The defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry then further misusued
his official capacity to influence , direct, coerce , instruct, or
otherwise bribe and solicitate the corrupt police officers to
instructed the first person of mexican american national origin by
the first name of Eddie Shawl to leave the pro se relator mothers
place of residence to avoid criminal charges only to be replaced by
another corrupt law enforcement official such as a heavy sett ,
bald head , mexican sheriff deputy employed by the El Paso
County Sheriff Department in El Paso Texas whom was also
portraying to be named Eddie Shawl whom was assigned to the El
Paso County Court House located at 500 East San Antonio Avenue
El Paso Texas 79901. The corrupt sheriff deputy repeatedly sexually assualted the pro
se relator mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores and held her hostage by
accompanieing her to her work place and back to her place of
residence on a daily basis so as to make sure that she would not go
to state or federal law enforcement agency to complain that she
was being sexually assaulted by the immediate relatives of the
same corrupt police officers that murder her eldest son Javier
Thereafter the pro se relator then went to the El Paso County
Sheriff Department Internal Affairs Division to complian against
the sheriff deputy that was sexually assualting the pro se relator
mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores.
As a result the defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry further
misused his official capacity to influence , instrict , direct, coerce ,
or otherwise bribe and solicitate the corrupt police officer named
Paul McDowell to instruct the sheriff deputy to leave the pro se
relators mother place of residence to avoid criminal charges only
to be replaced by a third person of mexican american national
origin that was also portraying to be named Eddie Shawl however the third person was actually a campus police officer from the El
Paso Community College Villa Verde Campus located at 919
Hunter Dr., El Paso Texas 79927.
The corrupt campus police officer that was a person of mexican
american national origin whom was also portraying to be named
Eddie Shawl also repeatedly sexaully assaulted the pro se relator
mother and held her hostage at the place of her residence to
prevent her from communicateing to state or federal law
enforcement agencies to complian that she was being sexually
assualted by the same corrupt police officers that conspired to kill
her son Javier Flores Junior.
By then the pro se relator had already started complaining to the
El Paso County District Attorney Jaime Ezparza in El Paso Texas,
that several corrupt police officers were sending their friends ,
coworkers , or relatives to sexaully assaulting the mother (Cynthia
Lorenza Flores) of the person (Javier Flores Junior) that the
corrupt police officers conspired to murder.
The corrupt campus police officer that was portaying to be named
Eddie Shaal retaliated against the pro se relator for complaining to the El Paso County District Attorney Jaime Ezparza by using
advanced technology with a direct signal to the satelite in
outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a genetic code to
cause the petitioners' mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores severe heart
pain for long durations exceeding calendar days in which was
equivalent in intensity to cardiac and respatory failure almost
leading to her death requireing medical treatment from a forensic
medical professional in a freeworld hospital to keep her from
dieing in which was solely conspired to intimidate the pro se
relators' mother to believe that the corrupt police officers would
use deadly technology to torture her to death in order to make the
pro se relators mother comply with the corrupt police officers
demands to divorce her husband and remarry one of the person
that was takeing turns sexually assaulting her for the purpose of
influenceing the justice officials to believe that because the pro se
relators' mother married one of the corrupt police officers or their
immediate relatives that were takeing turns sexaully assaulting
the pro se relators mother therefore the pro se relators mother
was not being sexaully assualted so as to prevent a criminal investigation that can result in criminal lawful sanctions against
the defendant and his co conspiratoring corrupt police officers or
their immediate relatives for sexaully assaulted the mother
(Cynthia Lorenza Flores) of the person (Javier Flores Junior) that
the corrupt police officers conspired to murder.
The corrupt campus police officer then left the pro se relators'
mothers' place of residence to avoid criminal charges , only to be
replaced by a fourth person of mexican american national origin
that was also portraying to be named Eddie Shawl whom was
directly related to the detective named Julio Ordaz from the El
Paso Police Department Internal Affairs Division whom first
interviewed the pro se relator at the time that the pro se relator
went to the El Paso Police Department Internal Affairs Division to
complain against the corrupt police officers Seargent Larra
making threats to cause the death of the pro se relator or his
immediate relatives in which was four months before the corrupt
police officer named Seargent Larras and his corrupt police
coworker named Paul McDowell carried out the death threat by shooting and killing the pro se relators brother Javier Flores
Junior.
It seemed as if the police detective named Julio Ordaz from the
internal affairs division decided to cover up the fact that the pro se
relator had reported the corrupt police officers Seargent Larras'
death threats to the internal affairs division detective named Julio
Ordaz four months before the corrupt police officer named Paul
McDowell had actually carried out the death threat by shooting
and killing the pro se relators' brother Javier Flores Junior in
which was so that the corrupt detective named Julio Ordaz could
participate in sending his immediate relative to sexually assualt
the pro se relators mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores.
official capacity to influence , instruct, coerce , direct, or
otherwise bribe and solicitate another corrupt detective named
Julio Ordaz to conspire to bribe or solicitate an attorney at law
named Victor Parra to coerce , intimidate , force , or otherwise
make death threats against the pro se relators mother to
intimidate her to pay for the services of the attorney at law named Victor Parra for the purpose of forceing the pro se relator mother
into divorceing her husband with the specific intent of remarrying
one of the four person that was takeing turns sexually assualting
the pro se relators mother so as to be able to influence the justice
officials to believe that because the pro se relators mother Cynthia
Lorenza Flores remarried one of the persons that was takeing
turns sexually assualting her therefore she was not being sexually
assualted to prevent a criminal investigation that can result in
criminal lawful sanctions against the defendant and his co-
conspiratoring corrupt police officers or their immediate relatives
for sexaully assualting the mother (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) of the
person (Javier Flores Junior) that the corrupt police officers
conspired to murder.
The divorce dispute was filed in the El Paso County 383rd Judicial
District Court located at 500 East San Antonio Avenue El Paso
Texas 79901 presideing family district judge Mike Herrera whom
was also notified of the aforementioned circumstances but decided
to proceed with the divorce anyway. The defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry had substantive
knowledge that the pro se relator would seek for the Travis
County District Attorney Office Public integerty Unit to conduct
an investigation into the murder of the relators brother Javier
Flores Junior and the sexual assault of the relators mother which
could have resulted in criminal lawful sanctions against the
defendant for misuseing his official capacity to instruct corrupt
police officers and their coworkers or relatives to take turns
repeatedly sexually assaulting the mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores
of the victum named Jaiver Flores Junior whom the corrupt police
officers conspired to murder.
Therefore the defendant malingered and construed circumstances
to where he could obstruct justice to prevent the Travis County
District Attorney Public Integerty Unit from launching an
investigation into the murder of the pro se relators brother Javier
Flores Junior and sexual assault of relators mother Cynthia
Lorenza Flores.
Whereby the defendant Richard James "Rick" Perry misused his
official capacity to influence , instruct, direct, coerce , or otherwise bribe and solicitate another police relative sit and wait
for a particular day when the Travis County District Attorney
Rosemary Lemhberg would drink on special occasions such as
birthday parties , get together , annerversiaries , Christmas , and
New Year in which was so that the defendants' police relative
could arrest the Travis County District Attorney Rosemary
Lehmberg for drunk driving and thereby malinger and construe
circumstances to promote a sufficient reason to not only remove
the district attorney from her official capacity to appoint another
person to preside as district attorney whom would ensure that no
criminal investigation would be launched into the murder of the
relators brother and the sexual assault of the relators mother but
also to create a good reason to veto funding to the Travis County
District Attorney Public Integerty Unit for the purpose of
eliminateing any public office with the jurisidictional ability to
launch investigation into allegation against high profile elected
official such as the defendant with the specific intent of prevent a
judicial investigation that could have resulted in criminal lawful
sanctions against the defendant and his co-conspiratoring corrupt police officer relatives for murdering the relators brother Javier
Flores Junior and sexually assaulting the relators mother Cynthia
Based on these circumstances the pro se relator submitted several
compliants requesting that the Travis County District Attorney
Rosemary Lehmberg to enforce the law by criminally prosecuteing
the corrupt police officers and their immediate relatives whom
were takeing turns sexually assualting the mother (Cynthia
Lorenza Flores) of the victum (Javier Flores Junior) that the
corrupt police officers conspired too murdered.
However Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg
refused to enforce the law by not criminally prosecuteing the
corrupt police officers or their immediate relatives for takeing
turns sexually assualting the petitioners' mother (Cynthia
Lorenza Flores) in which was because the defendant had veto
funding to the Travis County District Attorney Public Integerty
Unit for the purpose of eliminateing any public office with the
jurisidictional ability to launch investigation into allegation
against high profile elected official such as the defendant with the specific intent of prevent a judicial investigation that could have
resulted in criminal lawful sanctions against the defendant and
his co-conspiratoring corrupt police officers for murder the relators
brother Javier Flores Junior and sexually assaulting the relators
These circumstances clearly show that the defendant is
obstructing justice by engageing in standard of conduct that
allows , enables , or procurrs for corrupt police officers and their
immediate relatives to force a victum named Cynthia Lorenza
Flores that has been sexually assaulted by the corrupt police
officers or their immediate relatives, to pay for the legal services
of an attorney named Victor Parra for the purpose of initiateing a
cause of action to divorce her husband with the specific intent of
enableing the attorney at law named Victor Parra to force the
victum named (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) to remarry one of the
corrupt police officers or their immediate relatives that was
repeatedly sexually assaulting the victum named Cynthia Lorenza
Flores and holding the victum named Cynthia Lorenza Flores
hostage at the place of the victums named Cynthia Lorenza Flores residence so as to influence justice officials to believe that the
victum named (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) is not being sexually
assaulted because the victum named (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) has
been forced to remarry one of the corrupt police officer or their
immediate relatives that was sexually assaulting the victum
named Cynthia Lorenza Flores as a form of obstruction of justice.
In the present circumstances of the case , the Travis County
District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg has indicted the defendant
Richard James "Rick" Perry for coercion of a public official and
abuse of power.
The pro se relator has filed a motion to joinder of certain offenses
that the defendant committed in the commission of the criminal
offense settforth in the states indictment.
The defendant has appealed to the Third Court of Appeals in
attempt to throw out the indictment before the anyone finds out
about the circumstances of this case.
The Third Court of Appeals has refused to responed to the pro se
relators petition n for aminus cariae brief. As a result the pro se relator now appeals to the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals to seek the performance of a duty that is clearly
defined by law.
(8) Statement of Fact
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Criminal Procedure Article 21.24
(a) Two or more offenses may be joined in a single indictment,
information, or complaint, with each offense stated in a separate
count, if the offenses arise out of the same criminal episode, as
defined in Chapter 3 of the Penal Code.
(b) A count may contain as many separate paragraphs charging
the same offense as necessary, but no paragraph may charge more
than one offense.
(c) A count is sufficient if any one of its paragraphs is sufficient.
An indictment, information, or complaint is sufficient if any one of
its counts is sufficient.
The pro se relator has filed a motion to joinder of certain offenses
that the defendant committed in the commission of the pending
criminal offenses as settforth in the States' indictment. However the defendant may use Texas Rule of Evidence no.608 or
609 to attack the pro se relators character creditability based on
relators criminal conviction which has nothing to do with this
case.
However pursuant to Texas Rule of Criminal Procedure no. 408 if
the relator can prove that the joinder of criminal offenses was a
routine habit of the defendant, then nothing is left to decide upon
the relators creditability regardless of the relators criminal
history.
On those basis the relator contends that it is the defendant
routine habit to misuse his official capacity to influence , direct
,coerce , instruct, or other bribe and solicitate another police
relative to sit and wait for a particular elected official to drink on
special occasions for the purpose of conspireing to arrest the
elected official for drunk driving with the specific intent of
removeing that particular elected official from public office in the
commission of facilitateing a conspiracy to obstruct justice such as
preventing the elected official from participateing in a criminal
investigation that can result in criminal lawful sanctions against the defendant for continuesly engageing in negligent torturious
conduct while acting under the color of state law while in public
office.
The relator hereby gives judicial notice of an elected official named
Naomi Gonzales whom was elected state senator in the past two
year whom was also victumized by the defendants routine habit of
sending a police officer or relative to sit and wait for the then
elected Senator Naomi Gonzales to drink on special occasion for
the purpose of conspireing to arrest the elected official named
Naomi Gonzales with the specific intent of removeing her from
public office in the commission of facilitateing a conspiracy to
obstruct justice by preventing that elected official named Naomi
Gonzales from participateing in criminal investigation that could
have resulted in criminal lawful sanctions against the defendant
for continuesly engageing in negligent torturious conduct while
acting under the color of state law in public office.
The defendant has enacted this same habit or routine against the
Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg in the
commission of facilitateing a conspiracy to obstruct justice to prevent Rosemary Lehmberg from participateing in an
investigation that can result in criminal lawful sanctions against
the defendant for solicitateing premeditative capital murder of
Javier Flores Junior and sending different police officers or
persons to sexually assault the mother (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) of
the victum (Javier Flores Junior) the defendant (James Rick
Perry) conspired to murder.
Because there is evidence such as other witness testimony
regarding the defendants habit or routine therefore nothing is left
to decide upon the relators crediablity when determineing the
validity of joining certain offenses committed by the defendant
against the relator and his immediate relatives.
(9) Summary of Argument
(A)Standard of Review for Abuse of Discretion
A clear abuse of discretion is found only when the reviewing
courts actions were "so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount
to a clear and prejudicial error of law. The test is whether the
reviewing court clearly "acted without reference to any guiding rules and principles of law ," or "whether the act was arbitrary or
unreasonable". In an appeal, to determine if there is an abuse of
discretion , the reviewing court will review the entire record. The
Texas Supreme Court interpreted the phrase "a decision so
arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to a clear and prejudicial
error of law ," stating that it has different applications in different
cases depending upon the circumstances of each case.If the relator
seeks to overrule a lower reviewing court decision based on factual
issues or matters committed to the reviewing court discretion ,
"the relator must show the reviewing court could have
reached only one decision under the facts of law ".A
reviewing court has no discretion to determine the law or to apply
the law to the facts incorrectly.If the relator's complaint is that
the reviewing court incorrectly decided an issue of law , the relator
must show that the reviewing agencies failed to analyze or apply
the law correctly because a reviewing court erroneous
interpretation of the law constitutes a clear abuse of
discretion.Traditionally , a appeal is used to establish error for the
purpose of compeling the performance of a ministrial act or duty. An appeal may be granted to control the conduct of the reviewing
court when the duty to do the act commanded is ministrial and
nondiscretionary.An act is ministrial if the law prescribes the duty
to be performed by a reviewing court with such precision and
certainty that nothing is left to the exercise of discretion or
judgement. An act is not ministrial if it involves the exercise of
discretion or judgement in determineing whether the duty exists.
An appeal is appropriate when the reviewing court or the person
that is the object of the writ refused to perform an act required by
law.
An appeal will issue only to "correct a clear abuse of discretion or
the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no other
adequate remedy by law". If the basis of the appeal is the
performance of a legal duty , an appeal will not be granted unless
the appeal shows that the relator has a clear right to the
performance of the particular duty sought to be enforced.A party
must be legally entitled to the requested relief. (9)Argument
The lower reviewing courts actions were so arbitruary and
unreasonable so as to amount to a prejudicial error of law ,
because the reviewing court refused to allow the relator to
participate in the prosecution of this case which can be constituted
as aiding and abideing the defendant in the commission of a crime
to obstruct justice.
The lower reviewing court acted without any reference to the
guideing rules and principles of law , because the reviewing court
does not allow the relator to participate in the prosecution of this
criminal case which can be constituted as aiding and abideing the
defendant in the commission of a crime to obstruct justice in
which is based upon the fact that the reviewing court can only
reach one decision under the facts of law as clearly defined by the
Texas Rules of Criminal Procedure Artilce 21.24 which is to allow
the relator to joinder of certain criminal offenses committed by the
defendant in the commission of the pending criminal offenses as
settforth in the States indictment. This means that the lower reviewing court failed to analyzed or
interpreted the facts or rule of law incorrectly by refuseing to
allow the relator to participate in joining certain offenses that the
defendant committed in the commission of the pending criminal
offenses as settforth in the State's indictment due to the lower
reviewing courts errornous interpretation of the law which can be
constituted as a clear abuse of discretion.
The act that the relator seeks to compel is an act under Texas
Rules of Criminal Procedure 21.24 that is ministerial because it
prescribes the duty to be performed by a reviewing court with
such precision and certainty that nothing is left to the exercise of
discretion or judgement.
The relator has filed his motion for joinder of certain offenses
committed by the defendant in the commission of the criminal
offenses as settforth in the State's indictment.
However the lower district court and the lower court of appeals
has refused to consider relator motion for joinder of certain offenses because of the serious nature of the criminal case which
can be constituted as an abuse of discretion.
The relator is entitled to relief sought not only because the
criminal offenses settforth in the States indictment stemmed from
the commission of a crime committed by the defendant against the
relator but also because the relator has the constitutional right to
access to the court to challenge a constitutional deprivation of life ,
liberty , and life committed by the defendant.
DEFENDANTS FIRST RETALIATORY ADVERSED ACT AGAINST THE RELATOR FOR THE FILEING OF PREVIOUS AMINUS CARIAE BRIEF IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEAL
The defendant has previously misused his official capacity as
former governor for the state of texas to instruct, influence ,
direct, coerce , or otherwise bribe and solicitate another relative
or private citizen to impersonate to be a medical professional with
the specifc intent of following the relator in the course of going to a
freeworld hospital to seek medical treatment for the injuries the
relator sustained as a result of being tortured for the purpose of
enableing , procuring , or allowing the private citizen or
defendants relative whom is impersonateing to be a medical professional to influence , direct, instruct, coerce , or otherwise
bribe and solicitate another medical professional from the
freeworld hospital to falsely diagnose the relator with a mental
disorder so as to not only justify their actions of forcefully
administering psychoactive medication such as succylnolcholine in
attempt to cause an allergic reaction resulting in the relators
death but also to allege that the relator legal claims of the
defendants negligent torturious conduct are a result of a
delusional mental disorder to prevent a judicial investigation that
can result in criminal lawful sanctions against the defendant for
continuesly engageing in negligent torturious conduct that has
resulted in the death of more than four of the relators immediate
DEFENDANT JAMES RICK PERRY SECOUND PRIOR RETALIATION TO THE FILEING OF RELATORS AMINUS CARAIE BRIEF IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
The pro se relator has previously filed a petition for aminus cariae
brief specifically warning the Third Court of Appeal that the
defendant was causeing the death of members of the public and
therefore it was necessary to enforce the performance of a duty that was clearly defined by law by issueing a preliminary
injunction specifically prohibiting the defendant from further
causeing the death of another member of the public.
The lower Third Court of Appeals rejected the pro se relators
claims and as a result the defendant caused the death of a whole
family in Houston Texas.
The incident began after the Third Court of Appeals rendered
judgement on the relators petition for aminus caraie brief in
which was when the defendant instructed his law enforcement
relatives named Robert Horton to arrest the relator for a crime he
did not commit so as to prevent the relator from further
communicateing to the court of appeals.
After the relator was released from incarceration , he then moved
to another city such as Houston Texas to avoid any further
retaliation by the defendants police relatives.
The defendant then further retaliated against the relator for the
fileing of the aminus caraie brief by using advanced technology
with a direct signal to the satellite in outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a genetic code to profoundly disrupt the
personality and senses of a person named David Conley for long
durations exceeding calendar days in which was equivalent in
intensity to take physical control of the person named David
Conley mental state of mind so as to compel David Conley into an
act of dures by a calculated procedure to use a weapon such as a
gun to shoot and kill a whole family constituteing mass murder in
the first degree.
The pro se relators point of view is that if the defendant has used
advanced technology to hack a person to kill a whole family whats
not to say that the defendant will use deadly technology to torture
to death the pro se relator , or his immediate relatives such as
mother Cynthia Lorenza Flores and father Javier Vensor Flores
Senior , prosecuteing attorney , or district judge.
The pro se relator hereby gives judicial notice that the defendant
has threatened to instruct, influence , direct, coerce , or
otherwise bribe and solicitate another corrupt official such as
Jeffery Atkins , Jose Rodriguez , Robert Horton , Terence Horton ,
Jaime Ezparza , Anthony Cobos , appellate clerk for the U.S.Supreme Court named Higgins , or even an appellate clerk for
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to use advanced technology
with a direct signal to the satellite in outerspace that has the
capability of calculateing a genetic code to cause the pro se relator
, his mother , father , or other immediate relatives as named above
severe mental or physical pain for long duration exceeding
calendar days in which is equivalent to organ failure or
impairment of body functions leading to our death as a retaliatory
adversed act against the relator for fileing theis foregoing petition
for aminus cariae brief.
The relators previous aminus cariae brief has preeviously warned
the Third Court of Appeals of the defendants serial killing
rampage and was ignored in which allowed for the defendant to
continue killing members of the public such as a whole family in
Houston Texas.
For this reason it is necessary to not ignore the relators legal
claims for injunctive relief to protect the public interest of health
and safety. (11) Conclussion
Wherefore Primises Considered in conformance with the
prerequisites settforth under Texas Penal Code § 36.03 (a) A
person commits an offense if by means of coercion he:
(1) influences or attempts to influence a public servant in a
specific exercise of his official power or a specific performance of
his official duty or influences or attempts to influence a public
servant to violate the public servant's known legal duty; or
(2) influences or attempts to influence a voter not to vote or to
vote in a particular manner.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor unless
the coercion is a threat to commit a felony, in which event it is a
felony of the third degree.
(c) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)(1) of this
section that the person who influences or attempts to influence the
public servant is a member of the governing body of a
governmental entity, and that the action that influences or
attempts to influence the public servant is an official action taken
by the member of the governing body. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "official action" includes deliberations by the
governing body of a governmental entity.
The statements of facts settforth in this brief clearly establish that
the defendant is coerceing a public servant named Rosemary
Lehmberg district attorney for the Travis County District
Attorneys Office with the specific intent of facilitateing a
conspiracy against the pro se relators constitutional rights in the
commission of committing the criminal offense of solicitation of
capital murder in the first degree and sexually assaulting an
elderly the mother of the victum the defendant police relative
However the lower appellate court abused its discretion by
deviateing from the guideing rules and principles of law by ruleing
that the defendant has a constitutional right to freedom of speech
within the meaning of using a threat with the specific intent of
coerceing a public official which is a crime as clearly defined by
law under Texas Penal Code 36.03.
The lower appellate court further abused its discretion by using a
pretext for civil rights to elude criminal prosecution for political partisian purposes in the commission of facilitateing a conspiracy
against the pro se relators constitutional rights within the
meaning of covering up a crime of murder in the first degree and
sexual assault of an elderly person.
Further the lower appellate court justice have accepted bribes
from the defendant interest group to render a specific ruleing for
political partisian purpose in the commission of facilitateing a
conspiracy against the pro se relators constitutional rights within
the meaning of covering up murder in the first degree and sexual
assault of an elderly person in which overall constitutes a abuse of
discretion in the interest of justice.
Therefore nothing is left for the court discretion but to enforce the
performance of a duty that is clearly defined by law which is to
criminally prosecute the defendant for coercion of a public official
and abuse of power.
The pro se relator prays that the appellate court reinstate the
State of Texas criminal offense of coercion of a public official and
remand the case to the lower district court for trial. (12)Prayer
Wherefore Primsies Considered in conformance with the
prerequisites seetforth herein the relator prays that the reviewing
court to enforce the performance of a duty that is clearly defined
under the law by ministrially compelling the trial court to
consider the relator motion for joinder of certain offenses as
defined by Texas Rules of Criminal Procedure 21.24.
The relator further prays that the reviewing court enter a
preliminary injunction during the pendency of this appeal to
protect the relator , his immediate relatives , the district judge ,
and the prosecuteing attorney from being the victum of the
defendants intimidation , torture , coercion , death threats , and/or
serial killing rampage.
The pro se relator prays that the preliminary injunction
specifically state that the defendant is prohibited from using
advanced technology with a direct signal to the satellite in
outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a genetic code to
cause the pro se relator or his immediate relatives such as mother (Cynthia Lorenza Flores) , father (Javier Flores Junior) , sister
(Joann Flores) , brothers (Andy Flores , Micheal Rene Flores ,
Steven Flores), aunts (Yvonne Chavez , Martha Mendoza ,
Sandra Mendoza , , cousin (Christy Salas , Ricky Salas) , uncle
(Moise Mendoza , Peter Mendoza , Ricky Salas Sr., Tony Medriano
, Juan Flores , Arturo Flores , Chava Flores ) , and Grandmother
(Celia Flores) severe mental or physical pain for long durations
exceeding calendar days in which was equivalent in intensity to
organ failure or impairment of body functions leading to our death
in retaliation to the invocation of the relators constitutional rights
to file nonfrivolous legal claims challengeing a constitutional
deprivation of life , liberty , and property committed by the
defendant and his police relatives.
The pro se relator prays that the preliminary injunction further
specifically state that the defendant is prohibited from
influenceing , directing , coerceing , instructing , or otherwise
bribeing and solicitateing another corrupt law enforcement official
or immediate relative to use advanced technology with a direct
signal to the satellite in outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a genetic code to cause the pro se relator or his
immediate relatives such as mother (Cynthia Lorenza Flores ,
father (Javier Flores Junior) , sister (Joann Flores) , brothers
(Andy Flores , Micheal Rene Flores , Steven Flores), aunts
(Yvonne Chavez , Martha Mendoza , Sandra Mendoza , , cousin
(Christy Salas , Ricky Salas) , uncle (Moise Mendoza , Peter
Mendoza , Ricky Salas Sr., Tony Medriano , Juan Flores , Arturo
Flores , Chava Flores ) , and Grandmother (Celia Flores) severe
mental or physical pain for long durations exceeding calendar
days in which was equivalent in intensity to organ failure or
impairment of body functions leading to our death in retaliation to
the invocation of the relators constitutional rights to file
nonfrivolous legal claims challengeing a constitutional deprivation
of life , liberty , and property committed by the defendant and his
police relatives.
The relator further prays that the appellate court to enter a
preliminary injunction specifically stating that the defendant be
prohibited from misuseing his official capacity as former governor
for the state of texas to instruct, influence , direct, coerce , or otherwise bribe and solicitate another relative or private citizen to
impersonate to be a medical professional with the specifc intent of
following the relator in the course of going to a freeworld hospital
to seek medical treatment for the injuries the relator sustained as
a result of being tortured for the purpose of enableing , procuring ,
or allowing the private citizen or defendants relative whom is
impersonateing to be a medical professional to influence , direct,
instruct, coerce , or otherwise bribe and solicitate another medical
professional from the freeworld hospital to falsely diagnose the
relator with a mental disorder so as to not only justify their
actions of forcefully administering psychoactive medication such
as succylnolcholine in attempt to cause an allergic reaction
resulting in the relators death but also to allege that the relator
legal claims of the defendants negligent torturious conduct are a
result of a delusional mental disorder to prevent a judicial
investigation that can result in criminal lawful sanctions against
the defendant for continuesly engageing in negligent torturious
conduct that has resulted in the death of more than four of the relators immediate relatives constituteing mass murder in the
first degree.
The relator further prays that the appellate court to entr an order
specifically instructing the lower district court to consider the
merits of the relators motion for joinder of certain offense in the
interest of serveing justice for those victums that have died as a
result of the defendants negligent torturious conduct constituteing
mass murder in the first degree.
The relator prays for general relief as clearly defined by law.
Respectfully Submitted ,
Eric Flores , pro se relator
501 East 8th Street Austin Texas 78701
Pursuant to Penalty of Perjury (28 U.S.C. & 1746) the relator
hereby states , declares , and certifies that the foregoing brief is
true and correct. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to Penalty of Perjury (28 U.S.C. & 1746) the relator
hereby states, declares , and certifies that true and correct copies
of this foregoing brief was sent to the following parties of interest
settforth below , in particular ;
(i)Eric Flores is a party of interest whoms place of business is designated at General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr., El Paso Texas 79910.
(ii)Richard James "Rick" Perry is a party of interest whoms place of business is designated at 122 C St., NW, Ste. 200Washington, DC 20001.
(iii)The State of Texas is a party of interest whoms place of business is designated at State Capitol, P.O. Box 12697 Room 1E.8 Austin Texas 78701 Texas Court of Criminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308 Austin, Texas 78711
Trial Court Case No. D-l-DC-14-100139 Third Court of Appeals Case No.3-15-00063-CR Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Case No.PD-1067-15
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to the Health and Safety Code for the State of Texas the
pro se relator commissions the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in
the Public interest of health and safety to enter a protective order
prohibiting the defendant from further using deadly technology to
torture to death the pro se relator , his immediate relatives , the
prosecute attorney , and his immediate relatives as a retaliatory
adversed act against the States intent to prosecute the defendant
for abuse of power and coercion of public official. In support thereof the pro se relator states the following grounds
for relief, in particular ;
DISCRIPTION OF TORTURE TO BE PROHIBITED
(l)The pro se relator prays that the protective order specifically
state that the defendant be prohibited from further misuseing his
previous official capacity as governor for the state of Texas to
influence , instruct, direct, coerce , or otherwise bribe and
solicitate another corrupt official such as Clara Hernandez , Joann
Bernal, Paul McDowell (EPPD), Seargent Larra (EPPD), Jaime
Ezparza , Anthony Cobos , Jose Rodriguez , Kathleen Anderson ,
Manuel Fuentes , Rosemary Lehmberg , Mike Herrera , Ann
Crawford McClure , Gerald Hildebrand , Daina Natalicio , Ryan
Holmes , Gary Edens , David Fonseca , Jimmy McClane , Leo
Samaniego , R. Car Richard Rhodes Jose Flores , Richard Wiles ,
Guadalupe Rivera , Yvonne Rodriguez , Mary Ann Brambelt,
Patrick Garcia , Frank Montalvo , former appellate justice last
name Carr (Eighth District Court of Appeals) , David Briones ,
Kathleen Cardone , Micheal McDonald , Philipe Martinez , David
Guaderama , R.E. Thompson , and many others to use advanced technology with a direct signal to the satellite in outerspace that
has the capability of calculateing a genetic code to cause the pro se
relator , his immediate relatives , prosecuteing attorney , and the
district judge severe mental or physical pain in which is
equivalent in intensity to organ failure or impairmewnt of body
fucntions leading to our death in retaliation against us for
instituteing the invopcation of our constitutional right to
criminally prosecute the defendant for abuse of power and
coercion of public official.
(2)Further , the relator request that the protective order
specifically states that the defendant be prohibited from further
misuseing his previous official capacity as governor for the state of
Texas to use advanced technology with a direct signal to the
satellite in outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a
genetic code to cause the pro se relator , his immediate relatives ,
prosecuteing attorney , and the district judge severe mental or
physical pain in which is equivalent in intensity to organ failure
or impairmewnt of body fucntions leading to our death in
retaliation against us for instituteing the invopcation of our constitutional right to criminally prosecute the defendant for
abuse of power and coercion of public official.
(3)The relator request that the protective order specifically states
that the defendant be prohibited from misuseing his official
capacity as governor for the state of texas to influence , instruct,
direct, coerce , or otherwise bribe and solicitate another police
relative or private person to follow the relator , his immediate
relatives , the prosecuteing attorney , or the district judge in the
course of their daily business to instigate a physical altercation
with them for the purpose malingering or construeing false
probable cause so as to falsely justify the persons actions of using
a weapon such as a gun to shoot and kill the relator , his
immediate relatives , the prosecuteing attorney , or the district
judge as a retaliatory adversed act against us for instituteing the
invocation of our constitutional rights to criminally prosecute the
defendant for the criminal offenses as settforth in the State's
indictment.
(4) The relator request that the protective order specifically state
that the defendant be prohibited from further miuseing his official capacity as former governor for the state of texas to instruct,
influence , direct, coerce , or otherwise bribe and solicitate
another relative or private citizen to impersonate to be a medical
professional with the specifc intent of following the relator in the
course of going to a freeworld hospital to seek medical treatment
for the injuries the relator sustained as a result of being tortured
for the purpose of enableing , procuring , or allowing the private
citizen or defendants relative whom is impersonateing to be a
medical professional to influence , direct, instruct, coerce , or
otherwise bribe and solicitate another medical professional from
the freeworld hospital to falsely diagnose the relator with a
mental disorder so as to not only justify their actions of forcefully
administering psychoactive medication such as succylnolcholine in
attempt to cause an allergic reaction resulting in the relators
death but also to allege that the relator legal claims of the
delusional mental disorder to prevent a judicial investigation that
can result in criminal lawful sanctions against the defendant for
continuesly engageing in negligent torturious conduct that has resulted in the death of more than four of the relators immediate
CONCLUSSION AND PRAYER
prerequisites settforth herein the relator prays that the appellate
court enter a preliminary injunction that specifically states each of
the number prerequisites settforth above in the public interest of
health and safety includeing the parties named herein.
The relator prays for general relief.
ric Flores^jpro se relator
Pursuant to Penalty of Perjury (28 U.S.C. & 1746) the relator
hereby states , declares , and certifies that the foregoing brief is
Pursuant to Penalty of Perjury (28 U.S.C. & 1746) the relator
hereby states, declares , and certifies that true and correct copies
of this foregoing brief was sent to the following parties of interest
(i)Eric Flores is a party of interest whoms place of business is designated at General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr., El Paso Texas 79910.
(ii)Richard James "Rick" Perry is a party of interest whoms place of business is designated at 122 C St., NW, Ste. 200Washington, DC 20001.
(iii)The State of Texas is a party of interest whoms place of business is designated at State Capitol, P.O. Box 12697 Room 1E.8 Austin Texas 78701
Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick" (Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick") — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.