Perry Co. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
This text of 431 S.W.2d 310 (Perry Co. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR
The trial court rendered judgment on the verdict in favor of petitioner. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed such judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial. 424 S.W.2d 940. In the course of its opinion the intermediate court stated that the disclaimer appearing on the acknowledgments of the orders would, if properly pleaded and if the same was part of the contract between the parties, preclude a recovery for the negligence of respondents and the consequences of such negligence in regard to the use of the paint. The application for writ of error was refused, no reversible error, and petitioner’s motion for rehearing is now overruled. We are not to be understood, however, as either approving or disapproving the above-mentioned conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 S.W.2d 310, 11 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 618, 1968 Tex. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-co-v-sherwin-williams-co-tex-1968.