Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1255

CHRISTINA D. PERRY-BEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CITY OF NORFOLK,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00100-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: January 31, 2011 Decided: February 22, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christina D. Perry-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Wilbur Jacobs, II, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christina D. Perry-Bey appeals the district court’s

order dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to

comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, No.

2:08-cv-00100-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to

expedite is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED