Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk
This text of 412 F. App'x 638 (Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Christina D. Perry-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:08-cv-00100-MSD-DEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal [639]*639contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to expedite is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 F. App'x 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-bey-v-city-of-norfolk-ca4-2011.