Perla v. New York
392 U.S. 296, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1108, 88 S. Ct. 2062, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1355
Opinion
PERLA
v.
NEW YORK ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sackman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perla v. New York, 392 U.S. 296, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1108, 88 S. Ct. 2062, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1355 (1968).
392 U.S. 296 (Perla v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nichols v. Chief of Police of Natick
119 N.E.3d 333 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2019)
Shabazz v. Cole
69 F. Supp. 2d 210 (D. Massachusetts, 1999)
In re the Reports of the Saratoga County
77 A.D.2d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Dolan v. Kelly
76 Misc. 2d 151 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
Hardy v. Commissioner of Education
66 Misc. 2d 984 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Johnson Products, Inc. v. City Council of Medford
392 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 1968)