Pergament Scarsdale, Inc. v. Greenville Shopping Center

52 A.D.2d 635, 382 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12284
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pergament Scarsdale, Inc. v. Greenville Shopping Center. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 A.D.2d 864

Opinion

In an action to reform a lease, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 20, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared that the subject lease was clear and unambiguous. Judgment affirmed, with costs. To warrant the reformation of a lease, a showing must be made either of mutual mistake or of unilateral mistake accompanied by fraud (Barash v Pennsylvania Term. Real Estate Corp., 26 NY2d 77; Birnbaum v 225 Broadway Co., 50 AD2d 558). Appellant has failed to make the requisite showing. Gulotta, P. J., Margett, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pergament Scarsdale, Inc. v. Greenville Shopping Center, 52 A.D.2d 635, 382 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

52 A.D.2d 635 (Pergament Scarsdale, Inc. v. Greenville Shopping Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barash v. PA. TERM. REAL ESTATE CORP.
256 N.E.2d 707 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Birnbaum v. 225 Broadway Co.
50 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)