Birnbaum v. 225 Broadway Co.

50 A.D.2d 558, 375 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12303
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In an action to reform a lease, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 7, 1974, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff seeks to reform a written lease on the grounds of his mistake and the concealment of a lease provision by the defendant landlord, which provision, he contends, the landlord was duty bound to disclose. To warrant reformation of a lease, a showing must be made either of mutual mistake or of unilateral mistake accompanied by fraud (Barash v Pennsylvania Term. Real Estate Corp., 26 NY2d 77; Amend v Hurley, 293 NY 587). Such a showing has not been made in this case (cf. Pimpinello v [559]*559Swift & Co., 253 NY 159). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birnbaum v. 225 Broadway Co., 50 A.D.2d 558, 375 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12303 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 558 (Birnbaum v. 225 Broadway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pergament Scarsdale, Inc. v. Greenville Shopping Center
52 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)