Perez v. State

14 S.W.2d 273, 112 Tex. Crim. 130, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 249
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 1929·No. No. 12340.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— The offense is unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

After the adjournment of court appellant entered into an appeal bond. Said bond is approved by the sheriff, but not by the district judge. Art. 818 C. C. P. requires that an appeal bond shall be approved by the sheriff and the court trying the cause, or his successor in office. In the absence of a recognizance or appeal bond approved as the law requires, this court is without jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the case. Perkins v. State, 298 S. W. 577.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. State, 14 S.W.2d 273, 112 Tex. Crim. 130, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 249 (Tex. 1929).

14 S.W.2d 273 (Perez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earls v. State
650 S.W.2d 858 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)