Perez v. State
This text of 14 S.W.2d 273 (Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The offense is unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
After the adjournment of court appellant entered into an appeal bond. Said bond is approved by the sheriff, but not by the district judge. Art. 818 C. C. P. requires that an appeal bond shall be approved by the sheriff and the court trying the cause, or his successor in office. In the absence of a recognizance or appeal bond approved as the law requires, this court is without jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the case. Perkins v. State, 298 S. W. 577.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 S.W.2d 273, 112 Tex. Crim. 130, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.