Perez v. Perez
840 So. 2d 319, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1367, 2003 WL 289239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 2003·No. No. 3D01-1661·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed. The trial court’s rulings regarding the primary residence of the child of the marriage were within its discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); § 61.13(2), (3), Florida Statutes (2002). The appellant complains that a visitation schedule has not yet been established by the parties, but the final judgment reserves jurisdiction for the court to resolve that issue if the parties are unable to reach agreement.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Perez, 840 So. 2d 319, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1367, 2003 WL 289239 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
840 So. 2d 319 (Perez v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Faulk
840 So. 2d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)