Perez v. Perez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perez v. Perez

840 So. 2d 319, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1367, 2003 WL 289239

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 2003

DocketNo. 3D01-1661

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 840 So. 2d 319 (Perez v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. Perez, 840 So. 2d 319, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1367, 2003 WL 289239 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed. The trial court’s rulings regarding the primary residence of the child of the marriage were within its discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); § 61.13(2), (3), Florida Statutes (2002). The appellant complains that a visitation schedule has not yet been established by the parties, but the final judgment reserves jurisdiction for the court to resolve that issue if the parties are unable to reach agreement.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed. The trial court’s rulings regarding the primary residence of the child of the marriage were within its discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); § 61.13(2), (3), Florida Statutes (2002). The appellant complains that a visitation schedule has not yet been established by the parties, but the final judgment reserves jurisdiction for the court to resolve that issue if the parties are unable to reach agreement.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 So. 2d 319, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1367, 2003 WL 289239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-perez-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack