Perez v. Experian

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 5, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-09119·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ERIC ANDREW PEREZ, Plaintiff, 20-CV-9119 (CM) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR AMENDED IFP APPLICATION EXPERIAN, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $400.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00 administrative fee – or, to request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Plaintiff submitted an IFP application, but he does not answer any of the questions. Rather, he states that he “would like to pay [the filing] fee [of] $400.” (ECF No. 1, at 6.) Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of this order, the Court directs Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 in fees. If Plaintiff would prefer to submit an amended IFP application, he may complete the attached application. The application should be labeled with docket number 20-CV-9119 (CM) and provide facts establishing that he is unable to pay the filing fees. If the Court grants the amended IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. No summons shall issue at this time. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status 1s denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). Plaintiff has consented to electronic service. (ECF No. 5.) SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2020 , New York, New York huh. Hk Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Experian, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Perez v. Experian (Perez v. Experian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)