Perdomo v. State
960 So. 2d 11, 2007 WL 676011
Opinion
Maykel Omar PERDOMO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Martin J. Beguiristain, Miami, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General and Laura Moszer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
*12 PER CURIAM.
We affirm as the defendant's Motion for Discharge did not, as a matter of law, constitute a "Notice of Expiration of Speedy Trial Time" as contemplated by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)(2). Clark v. State, 698 So.2d 1274, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perdomo v. State, 960 So. 2d 11, 2007 WL 676011 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
960 So. 2d 11 (Perdomo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. State
698 So. 2d 1274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)