Perdomo v. State
This text of 960 So. 2d 11 (Perdomo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Maykel Omar PERDOMO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Martin J. Beguiristain, Miami, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General and Laura Moszer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
*12 PER CURIAM.
We affirm as the defendant's Motion for Discharge did not, as a matter of law, constitute a "Notice of Expiration of Speedy Trial Time" as contemplated by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)(2). Clark v. State, 698 So.2d 1274, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
960 So. 2d 11, 2007 WL 676011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perdomo-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.