Peranzo v. Coughlin

Second Circuit

Peranzo v. Coughlin

850 F.2d 125, 1988 WL 67059

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1988

DocketNo. 1269, Docket 88-2030

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 850 F.2d 125 (Peranzo v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peranzo v. Coughlin, 850 F.2d 125, 1988 WL 67059 (2d Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by New York State prisoners from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Leonard B. Sand, Judge) granting summary judgment in favor of New York corrections officials in the prisoners’ suit challenging the reliability of urinalysis drug test results for use as evidence sufficient to warrant prison discipline. The tests are performed by State officials using the Syva Company’s EMIT-st urinalysis drug detection kits. Evidence before Judge Sand established that the testing procedure — an initial test and a subsequent confirming test — has an accuracy of at least 98%. Though the risk of false positives has not been entirely eliminated, we agree with Judge Sand that use of the test results may be relied upon as sufficient evidence to warrant prison discipline under the standards of Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-55, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 2773, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985). We also agree that the detention prior to the disciplinary hearings was administrative and conformed to the requirements of due process. See Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 103 S.Ct. 864, 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); Bolden v. Alston, 810 F.2d 353 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 229, 98 L.Ed.2d 188 (1987).

On the basis of Judge Sand’s well-reasoned opinion, reported at 675 F. Supp. 102, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by New York State prisoners from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Leonard B. Sand, Judge) granting summary judgment in favor of New York corrections officials in the prisoners’ suit challenging the reliability of urinalysis drug test results for use as evidence sufficient to warrant prison discipline. The tests are performed by State officials using the Syva Company’s EMIT-st urinalysis drug detection kits. Evidence before Judge Sand established that the testing procedure — an initial test and a subsequent confirming test — has an accuracy of at least 98%. Though the risk of false positives has not been entirely eliminated, we agree with Judge Sand that use of the test results may be relied upon as sufficient evidence to warrant prison discipline under the standards of Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-55, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 2773, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985). We also agree that the detention prior to the disciplinary hearings was administrative and conformed to the requirements of due process. See Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 103 S.Ct. 864, 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); Bolden v. Alston, 810 F.2d 353 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 229, 98 L.Ed.2d 188 (1987).

On the basis of Judge Sand’s well-reasoned opinion, reported at 675 F. Supp. 102, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

850 F.2d 125, 1988 WL 67059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peranzo-v-coughlin-ca2-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack