Pepper v. Bentley

59 So. 3d 695, 2010 Ala. LEXIS 185, 2010 WL 3797960
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedSeptember 30, 2010
Docket1071469
StatusPublished

This text of 59 So. 3d 695 (Pepper v. Bentley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pepper v. Bentley, 59 So. 3d 695, 2010 Ala. LEXIS 185, 2010 WL 3797960 (Ala. 2010).

Opinions

MURDOCK, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

LYONS, STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, and SHAW, JJ., concur. COBB, C.J., and WOODALL and SMITH, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)
Helton v. Helton
362 So. 2d 257 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Pepper v. Bentley
59 So. 3d 684 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 So. 3d 695, 2010 Ala. LEXIS 185, 2010 WL 3797960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pepper-v-bentley-ala-2010.