People's Railroad v. Syracuse, Binghamton & New York Railroad

6 N.Y.S. 326, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 561
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 23, 1889·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order vacated an injunction order which in effect declared the right of plaintiff to cross the road of the defendant without compensation or regulations prescribed as to the manner of crossing. The defendant had an easement upon which the plaintiff sought to impose a burden without compensation. We are of the opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to impose such a burden as its road built across the defendant’s track would be, until the questions of compensation and manner of crossing are legally determined. In re Lockport, etc., R. Co., 19 Hun, 38; 1 Redf. R. R. 638; Howlett v. New York, etc., Ry. Co., 14 Abb. N. C. 328, affirmed, 28 Hun, 55; People v. O'Brien, 111 N. Y. 1, 18 N. E. Rep. 692.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People's Railroad v. Syracuse, Binghamton & New York Railroad, 6 N.Y.S. 326, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 561 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

6 N.Y.S. 326 (People's Railroad v. Syracuse, Binghamton & New York Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . O'Brien
18 N.E. 692 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Howlett v. N. Y., West Shore, &c. Railway Co.
14 Abb. N. Cas. 328 (New York Supreme Court, 1882)