People's Railroad v. Syracuse, Binghampton, etc. Railroad
This text of 22 Abb. N. Cas. 427 (People's Railroad v. Syracuse, Binghampton, etc. Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order vacated an injunction order which in effect declared the right of plaintiff to cross the road of the defendant without compensation or regulations prescribed as to the manner of crossing.
The defendant had an easement upon which the plaintiff sought to impose a burden without compensation. We are of the opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to impose [438]*438such a burden ás its road, built across the defendant’s track, would be, until the questions of compensation and manner of crossing are legally determined (Matter of Lockport, etc., 19 Hun, 38, 1 Redfield on Railways, 638; Howlett v. N. Y., West Shore, etc. Ry. Co., 14 Abb. N. C. 328 ; aff’d 28 Hun, 55; People v. O’Brien, 111 N. Y. 1; s. c., 18 Northeast. Rep. 692).
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Abb. N. Cas. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-railroad-v-syracuse-binghampton-etc-railroad-nysupct-1889.