People v. Zeigler

238 A.D.2d 245, 656 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4060

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J., on motions; Juanita Bing Newton, J., at plea and sentence), rendered September 21, 1994, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and absconding in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s request for new assigned counsel was properly denied, since defendant failed to establish good cause for such substitution (People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822). On the existing record, we conclude that defendant received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his knowing, intelligent and voluntary plea of guilty (People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). The court’s summary denial of defendant’s suppression motions was proper (People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 430), and we reject defendant’s suggestion that Mendoza should not be applied to this case (see, People v Hill, 85 NY2d 256). Defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Zeigler, 238 A.D.2d 245, 656 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

238 A.D.2d 245 (People v. Zeigler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Hill
648 N.E.2d 455 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Mendoza
624 N.E.2d 1017 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Sides
551 N.E.2d 1233 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)