People v. Zapata

138 A.D.3d 585, 28 N.Y.S.3d 613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Zapata. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 A.D.3d 477
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 2016·No. 913 429/10·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J.), rendered November 29, 2012, as amended April 10, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of three counts of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of six years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for a youthful offender determination, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, based on People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]), defendant is entitled to an express youthful offender determination.

Concur — Tom, J.P, Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Zapata, 138 A.D.3d 585, 28 N.Y.S.3d 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 585 (People v. Zapata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rudolph
997 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)