People v. Zapata

138 A.D.3d 585, 28 N.Y.S.3d 613
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 21, 2016
Docket913 429/10
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.3d 585 (People v. Zapata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Zapata, 138 A.D.3d 585, 28 N.Y.S.3d 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J.), rendered November 29, 2012, as amended April 10, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of three counts of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of six years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for a youthful offender determination, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, based on People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]), defendant is entitled to an express youthful offender determination.

Concur — Tom, J.P, Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rudolph
997 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.3d 585, 28 N.Y.S.3d 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zapata-nyappdiv-2016.