People v. Yut Ling
16 P. 489, 74 Cal. 569, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 795
Opinion
There was no misconduct of the jury in this case. It never separated.
When the jury went to view the premises, the judge of the court should have gone along with them. It was the right of defendant to have the judge accompany the jurors when they went to take this view. As the judge did not do this, the judgment and order denying a new trial must be reversed, and the cause remanded, that a new trial may be had.
Ordered accordingly..
Paterson, J., and McFarland, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Yut Ling, 16 P. 489, 74 Cal. 569, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 795 (Cal. 1888).
16 P. 489 (People v. Yut Ling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rau v. Redwood City Woman's Club
245 P.2d 12 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
People v. Collazo
33 P.R. 48 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1924)
Pueblo v. Collazo
33 P.R. Dec. 49 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1924)
State v. Moon
117 P. 757 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1911)
People v. Cord
108 P. 511 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
People v. White
90 P. 471 (California Court of Appeal, 1907)
Elias v. Territory of Arizona
76 P. 605 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1904)
State v. Mortensen
73 P. 562 (Utah Supreme Court, 1903)