People v. Yancy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Yancy

189 A.D.2d 793

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 189 A.D.2d 793 (People v. Yancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Yancy, 189 A.D.2d 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), rendered April 26, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in unavailing. The record demonstrates that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see generally, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Moreover, to the extent that the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based on matters outside of the record, it is not [794]*794reviewable on direct appeal (see, People v Pampalone, 183 AD2d 431; People v Ford, 182 AD2d 565; People v Pelaccio, 159 AD2d 734; People v Sampson, 156 AD2d 492). Balletta, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), rendered April 26, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in unavailing. The record demonstrates that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see generally, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Moreover, to the extent that the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based on matters outside of the record, it is not [794]*794reviewable on direct appeal (see, People v Pampalone, 183 AD2d 431; People v Ford, 182 AD2d 565; People v Pelaccio, 159 AD2d 734; People v Sampson, 156 AD2d 492). Balletta, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-yancy-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack