People v. Blumenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blumenthal

191 A.D.2d 702, 596 N.Y.S.2d 718

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 702 (People v. Blumenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blumenthal, 191 A.D.2d 702, 596 N.Y.S.2d 718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.), rendered December 5, 1991, convicting her of assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The defendant’s contention that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. The defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Yancy, 189 AD2d 793; People v Ghee, 153 AD2d 954).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.), rendered December 5, 1991, convicting her of assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The defendant’s contention that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. The defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Yancy, 189 AD2d 793; People v Ghee, 153 AD2d 954).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 702, 596 N.Y.S.2d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blumenthal-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack