People v. Yammie

134 A.D.3d 864, 19 N.Y.S.3d 900
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 9, 2015
Docket2013-04977
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 A.D.3d 864 (People v. Yammie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Yammie, 134 A.D.3d 864, 19 N.Y.S.3d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from so much of a sentence of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Foley, J.), imposed April 16, 2013, as, upon imposing sentence upon his plea of guilty, denied him youthful offender treatment.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentencing court should have sentenced him as a youthful offender (see People v Pacherille, 25 NY3d 1021, 1024 [2015]; People v Drammeh, 100 AD3d 650 [2012]; People v Franko, 98 AD3d 525 [2012]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Jarama
2016 NY Slip Op 8882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.3d 864, 19 N.Y.S.3d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-yammie-nyappdiv-2015.