People v. Yammie
This text of 134 A.D.3d 864 (People v. Yammie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from so much of a sentence of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Foley, J.), imposed April 16, 2013, as, upon imposing sentence upon his plea of guilty, denied him youthful offender treatment.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed insofar as appealed from.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentencing court should have sentenced him as a youthful offender (see People v Pacherille, 25 NY3d 1021, 1024 [2015]; People v Drammeh, 100 AD3d 650 [2012]; People v Franko, 98 AD3d 525 [2012]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D.3d 864, 19 N.Y.S.3d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-yammie-nyappdiv-2015.