Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Jarama

People v. Jarama

2016 NY Slip Op 8882, 145 A.D.3d 1034, 42 N.Y.S.3d 854
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 28, 2016
Docket2014-08499
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 8882 (People v. Jarama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jarama, 2016 NY Slip Op 8882, 145 A.D.3d 1034, 42 N.Y.S.3d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), imposed September 16, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Yammie, 134 AD3d 864 [2015]).

Eng, P.J., Hall, Cohen, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Yammie
134 A.D.3d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 NY Slip Op 8882, 145 A.D.3d 1034, 42 N.Y.S.3d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jarama-nyappdiv-2016.