People v. Wynn

248 A.D.2d 494, 668 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2280
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), rendered October 30, 1996, convicting him of assault in the third degree and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the mere fact that the complainant was employed by the Westchester County District Attorney’s Office did not warrant disqualification of the prosecutor and did not render the Grand Jury proceedings defective (see, People v Seymour, 225 AD2d 487; People v Freeman, 172 AD2d 1045).

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in accepting the People’s explanations for challenging two black venirepersons during jury selection (see, People v Celestine, 243 AD2d 485; People v Brooks, 242 AD2d 336).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Miller, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wynn, 248 A.D.2d 494, 668 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 494 (People v. Wynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Parker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
People v. Drago
207 A.D.3d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Hooper
288 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)