People v. Wright

55 A.D.3d 811, 865 N.Y.S.2d 563
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 A.D.3d 1142

Opinion

by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated November 14, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to assess 20 points because he engaged in a continuing course of sexual misconduct is based on clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wright, 53 AD3d 963, 964 [2008]; People v Di John, 48 AD3d 1302, 1303 [2008]; People v Roberts, 38 AD3d 1151, 1152 [2007]). Accordingly, the County Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender (see People v Jenkins, 24 AD3d 645 [2005]). Fisher, J.P., Covello, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wright, 55 A.D.3d 811, 865 N.Y.S.2d 563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

55 A.D.3d 811 (People v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jenkins
24 A.D.3d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Roberts
38 A.D.3d 1151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Di John
48 A.D.3d 1302 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Wright
53 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)