People v. Wright

221 A.D.2d 393, 635 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 A.D.2d 875

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered May 26, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s jury instructions is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245,

[394]*394250), and, in any event, without merit. The jury charge, as given, adequately and properly instructed the jury on the elements of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (see, 2 CJI[NY] PL 165.40, at 1040A-1040E). Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wright, 221 A.D.2d 393, 635 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

221 A.D.2d 393 (People v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)