People v. Wooden
290 N.E.2d 436, 31 N.Y.2d 753, 338 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1012
Opinion
no opinion.
Concur: Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Jasen and Gibson. Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke and Breitel concur on constraint of People v. Lopez (28 N Y 2d 23, cert. den. 404 U. S. 840; but see United States ex rel. Lopez v. Zelker, 344 F. Supp. 1050, affd. 465 F. 2d 1405), insofar as the appellant’s postindictment statement has been held admissible.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Wooden, 290 N.E.2d 436, 31 N.Y.2d 753, 338 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1012 (N.Y. 1972).
290 N.E.2d 436 (People v. Wooden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Damiano
663 N.E.2d 607 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Jones
517 N.E.2d 865 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Marshall
98 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Colon
62 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Cranmer
55 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Dugan
53 A.D.2d 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Hobson
348 N.E.2d 894 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Santos
85 Misc. 2d 602 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
United States ex rel. Wooden v. Vincent
391 F. Supp. 1260 (S.D. New York, 1974)
People v. Wooden
291 N.E.2d 727 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)