People v. Wisniewski
This text of 74 A.D.3d 1881 (People v. Wisniewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1882]*1882The case is held, the decision is reserved, the motion to relieve counsel of assignment is granted and new counsel is to be assigned. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted upon a guilty plea of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31), and was sentenced as a second felony drug offender to a determinate term of imprisonment of two and one-half years and two years postrelease supervision. Defendant’s assigned appellate counsel has moved to be relieved of the assignment pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38 [1979]), and has submitted an affidavit in which he concludes that there are no nonfrivolous issues meriting this Court’s consideration. A review of the sentencing minutes reveals that the court did not ask defendant prior to sentencing whether he wished to controvert the allegations contained in the second felony offender statement as required by CPL § 400.21 (3). Therefore, a nonfrivolous issue exists as to the legality of the sentence. Accordingly, we relieve counsel of his assignment and assign new counsel to brief this issue, as well as any other issues that counsel’s review of the record may disclose. (Appeal from Judgment of Wyoming County Court, Michael F. Griffith, J.—Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance, 5th Degree). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Sconiers, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 A.D.3d 1881, 902 N.Y.S.2d 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wisniewski-nyappdiv-2010.