People v. Wiltshire

2021 NY Slip Op 06634, 199 A.D.3d 1025, 154 N.Y.S.3d 788
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 2021
Docket2019-02807
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 06634 (People v. Wiltshire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wiltshire, 2021 NY Slip Op 06634, 199 A.D.3d 1025, 154 N.Y.S.3d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Wiltshire (2021 NY Slip Op 06634)
People v Wiltshire
2021 NY Slip Op 06634
Decided on November 24, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 24, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

2019-02807
2019-02990

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Markeus Wiltshire, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 17-00749, 17-00775)


Scott M. Bishop, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Maria Wager and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), both rendered February 15, 2018, each convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. Although the Supreme Court indicated that there were certain rights that survived the waiver of the right to appeal, it gave no indication as to what those rights were (see People v Coverdale, 189 AD3d 1610).

The Supreme Court fulfilled its responsibility to consider whether the defendant should be afforded youthful offender treatment (see People v Rudolph, 21 NY3d 497). Under the circumstances of this case, the denial of youthful offender treatment was not an improvident exercise of discretion.

MASTRO, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
2025 NY Slip Op 04662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Rodriguez
2025 NY Slip Op 00883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Bruce
199 N.Y.S.3d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 06634, 199 A.D.3d 1025, 154 N.Y.S.3d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wiltshire-nyappdiv-2021.