People v. Rodriguez

2025 NY Slip Op 06970
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 2025
DocketSCI No. 70239/24; Appeal No. 5378; Case No. 2024-00991
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 06970 (People v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rodriguez, 2025 NY Slip Op 06970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Rodriguez (2025 NY Slip Op 06970)
People v Rodriguez
2025 NY Slip Op 06970
Decided on December 16, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: December 16, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Kennedy, Mendez, Michael, Chan, JJ.

SCI No. 70239/24|Appeal No. 5378|Case No. 2024-00991|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Elliot Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.


Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Shaina R. Watrous of counsel), for appellant.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jonathan Svetkey, J., at plea; Laurie Peterson, J., at sentencing), rendered January 26, 2024, purporting to convict defendant of two counts of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to concurrent jail terms of one year, unanimously modified, to the extent of vacating the sentence imposed on the second count, and otherwise affirmed.

The sentencing court, erroneously believing that defendant pled guilty to two counts, sentenced him to two concurrent one-year sentences. However, defendant only pled guilty to one attempted third-degree sale count, and thus was only convicted of one count. Accordingly, as the People concede, there was no legal basis for his second, concurrent sentence (see CPL 1.20[13], [14]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: December 16, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rodriguez
2025 NY Slip Op 06970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 06970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-2025.