People v. Wilson

293 A.D.2d 400, 740 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4070
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 A.D.2d 645

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered April 29, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

[401]*401The court properly declined to instruct the jury on the defense of agency since there is no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, that supports a finding that defendant was acting only on behalf of the buyer (see, People v Herring, 83 NY2d 780). Defendant was intimately involved in the drug sale and the evidence, viewed as a whole, established that he had an ongoing relationship with the other participants.

We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilson, 293 A.D.2d 400, 740 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 400 (People v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Herring
632 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)