People v. Wilson

267 A.D.2d 409, 700 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13136
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 A.D.2d 161

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered July 22, 1998, convicting him of criminal [410]*410sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s application to preclude the identification testimony of the undercover officer who was the so-called “ghost” in this buy and bust operation. The ghost was a trained undercover officer who observed the defendant during the drug transaction, with the knowledge that the defendant would shortly thereafter be arrested (see, People v Broadwater, 248 AD2d 719). Moreover, the post-arrest viewing of the defendant “occurred at a place and time sufficiently connected and contemporaneous to the arrest itself as to constitute the ordinary and proper completion of an integral police procedure” (People v Wharton, 74 NY2d 921, 922-923; see also, People v Broadwater, supra).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilson, 267 A.D.2d 409, 700 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 409 (People v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wharton
549 N.E.2d 462 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Broadwater
248 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)