People v. Wilson

237 A.D.2d 973, 656 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to vacate defendant’s conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10. The record is devoid of evidence that the People entered into an agreement with a prosecution witness to induce him to testify (cf., People v Steadman, 82 NY2d 1; People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490). Further, the record establishes that the People satisfied their statutory obligation to disclose the criminal history of that witness to defendant (see, CPL 240.45 [1] [b], [c]). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.— CPL art 440.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilson, 237 A.D.2d 973, 656 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 973 (People v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fyffe
249 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)