People v. Wilson

201 A.D.2d 399, 607 N.Y.S.2d 663
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), entered January 13, 1993, suppressing physical evidence, unanimously affirmed.

The hearing court properly found that while the police could lawfully approach defendant for mere inquiry regarding [400]*400his early morning "huddle” with two other individuals in front of a known drug location (People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181, 185), the officer’s direction that defendant halt and take his hands out of his pockets escalated the level of intrusion to that of the common law right of inquiry, requiring "a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot” (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223), a circumstance, as conceded by the arresting officer, not present in this case. The hearing court also properly found that defendant’s actions in dropping a bag containing contraband as he took his hands out of his pockets as directed, was not a calculated, voluntary abandonment, but a spontaneous reaction to improper police action (People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398, 404, cert denied 444 US 969). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Asch and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilson, 201 A.D.2d 399, 607 N.Y.S.2d 663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 399 (People v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Giles
223 A.D.2d 39 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Cook
168 Misc. 2d 256 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)