People v. Wilson

171 A.D.2d 511, 567 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3463
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 A.D.2d 628

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered on August 29, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing defendant to a definite term of imprisonment of six months, and five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, Iv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilson, 171 A.D.2d 511, 567 N.Y.S.2d 238, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

171 A.D.2d 511 (People v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Felman
141 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)