People v. Wilson
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered October 26, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The defendant’s contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutrix to cross-examine his alibi witness concerning the latter’s pretrial silence, without a proper foundation having been laid, and without a limiting instruction (see People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311), has not been preserved for our review (People v Rossman, 95 AD2d 873). Under the circumstances presented herein, most noteworthy of which is the certainty of the complainants’ identification of defendant as one of the perpetrators of the robbery (cf. People v Orse, 91 AD2d 1003), we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Walker, 104 AD2d 573).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or lacking in merit. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
105 A.D.2d 815 (People v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.