People v. Williams

2019 NY Slip Op 8492
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.3d 1188
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 2019·No. 10406 2597/15·Published

Opinion

People v Williams (2019 NY Slip Op 08492)
People v Williams
2019 NY Slip Op 08492
Decided on November 21, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 21, 2019
Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Webber, Kern, JJ.

10406 2597/15

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Michael Williams, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Beulah Agbabiaka of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Laura E. Meehan of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J. at suppression hearing; Ellen N. Biben J. at plea; Charles H. Solomon, J. at sentencing), rendered August 17, 2017, convicting defendant of kidnapping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record supports the hearing court's finding that the lineup at which defendant was identified was not unduly suggestive (see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]). Although defendant was the only person wearing shorts in the lineup conducted several days after the crime, a fair reading of the investigating detective's testimony fails to support defendant's assertion that the identifying witness had described defendant as wearing shorts, let alone that this was a "prominent" feature of the witness's detailed description. In any event, the shorts (worn in July), and the other clothing features that defendant cites as suggestive were generic and ordinary articles of clothing (see People v McBride, 14 NY3d 440, 448 [2010]; People v Gilbert, 295 AD2d 275, 277 [1st Dept 2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 558 [2002]), and there is no reason to believe that defendant was singled out for identification.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 21, 2019

DEPUTY CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 2019 NY Slip Op 8492 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 8492 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McBride
928 N.E.2d 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Chipp
552 N.E.2d 608 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Gilbert
295 A.D.2d 275 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)