People v. Williams

2017 NY Slip Op 8057, 155 A.D.3d 1260, 64 N.Y.S.3d 747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 2017·No. 108852·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Rumsey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Lynch, J.), rendered July 12, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

Defendant, who was 18 years old at the time of the crime, pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, stemming from his possession and discharge of a semiautomatic weapon on the street in the City of Albany. County Court sentenced defendant to a prison term of seven years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, contending that County Court abused its discretion in denying him youthful offender status and that the sentence was harsh and excessive.

We affirm. Because defendant was convicted of an armed felony offense, as relevant here, he was required to demonstrate “mitigating circumstances that bear directly upon the manner in which the crime was committed” in order to be eligible for youthful offender status (CPL 720.10 [3] [i]; see People v Butler, 126 AD3d 1122, 1124 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 1199 [2015]; People v Brodhead, 106 AD3d 1337, 1337 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1087 [2014]). As a review of the record reflects that defendant failed to establish the existence of any mitigating factors, we find no abuse of discretion in County Court’s denial of youthful offender status (see People v Middlebrooks, 25 NY3d 516, 526-527 [2015]; People v Butler, 126 AD3d at 1124). Furthermore, we have reviewed defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed, which was less than the statutory maximum (see Penal Law §§ 70.02 [3] [b]; 265.03 [3]), was harsh and excessive and find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Brodhead, 106 AD3d at 1337).

Garry, J.P., Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 2017 NY Slip Op 8057, 155 A.D.3d 1260, 64 N.Y.S.3d 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 8057 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harrell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
People v. McLaughlin
208 A.D.3d 1556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Colon
175 N.Y.S.3d 154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Meridy
2021 NY Slip Op 02894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Lane
2021 NY Slip Op 01443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Martz
2020 NY Slip Op 1528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)